Ann

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    Yes.

    Simple, yet elegantly useful and time-saving (obviates possible need to consult calendar).

    Thank you.

  2. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    Sorting would be very helpful, as would FOLDER functions that permit deletion, editing, and inclusion of Sent mail.

    The archivery would be better with folders,too (for example, I like my arcives to mirror the structure of my current folders).

    Thank you.

  3. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    NON-email-username option is essential for MUCH better security (for users who are careful to invent private usernames and strong pa for their accountl).

    Those who wish to use their emsil prefix (name prceding @) could have that option, too, because people vary in the level of security they feel they need . . . and are willing to habitually protect.

  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    Options are good.
    When tutanota succeeds as we must all hope it will--without ever compromising core values and fundamental mision--the number of users will be so large that multiple suffixes simply must be available to those who eschew, e.g., "MyName36542569"@suffix....

    To be universal, several suffix choices better honor different cultures, generations,etc.

    Thank you.

  5. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  8 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    "Name" + <email>

    Name: (a) as is set in Contacts or, if not stored there, (b) as sender gives it

    Address: with a drop-down menu for contacts with >1 address.

    Thank you.

  6. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    For simple users, just make it easy for us to quickly "delete" one or many (checkboxes) items that we don't want.

    AND to edit what we do keep.

    Thank you.

  7. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    YES. Whether I am sending or receiving, let me *see* which "me" is involved:
    either--
    - my address; or, best,
    - a name I set myself for each of my identities.

    Ann supported this idea  · 
  8. 825 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  19 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann commented  · 

    Agree. The signature feature is useless to me unless I waste either my alias address or my main address.

    Why would someone use an alias account if s/he is going to put the SAME identity in the signature of both the main and the alias account??

    (I hope the free account isn't being set up with this meaningless joint signature . . . only to force a purchase in order to actually have BOTH a real alias and a non-illusory signature option.)

  9. 104 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann supported this idea  · 
    Ann commented  · 

    YES!
    To be forced to surrender half of one's security at the most fundamental level because a site/app demands use of part/all of one's email address is . . . a stunning, unnerving crack in privacy and security.

    Why worry about two-factor security if one hasn't first done the easiest two things to "lock the door" in the first place?!

Feedback and Knowledge Base